Re: [PATCH 1/1] 3.18.17-rt14 locktorture: Do NOT include rwlock.h directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Including rwlock.h directly will cause kernel builds to fail
if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is defined. The correct header file
(rwlock_rt.h OR rwlock.h) will be included by spinlock.h which
is included by locktorture.c anyway.

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang M. Reimer <linuxball@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index ec8cce2..aa60d91 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/rwlock.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
--
1.9.1

On 20.07.2015 17:47, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* linuxball | 2015-07-20 11:33:12 [+0200]:

Including rwlock.h directly will cause kernel builds to fail
if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is defined. The correct header file
(rwlock_rt.h OR rwlock.h) will be included by spinlock.h which
is included by locktorture.c anyway.
Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
     11) Sign your work

Sebastian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux