On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:45:35 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/23/2015 06:30 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I'd be sleeping better at night with a third queue. I'll write up a > > patch and post that as an RFC as well. This will at a minimum keep with > > the paradigm of mainline linux. > > We had three queues. We are down to two and I think this is a good > thing. We only deal with FULL_NOHZ in hardirq context (looking at > v4.0-RT). Before that (FULL_NOHZ) everything was handled in softirq and > nobody was concerned (saw a problem). > > It would be good if we would address a regression or a bug or something > like that. The irq_work users may need to be audited. But I understand that it may not be a regression. I'm still worried that something will come along that will be affected by this with strange side effects. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
