On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:11 +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2015 16:38:25 +0200 > John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This is a terrible hack, but I'm afraid to remove it yet. > > Even systems as recent as Fedora 19 have a libnuma less than that. > > pm -qf /usr/lib64/libnuma.so > > numactl-devel-2.0.8-4.fc19.x86_64 > > [jkacur@riemann rt-tests]$ cat /etc/fedora-release > > Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) > > According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases that is an old > unsupported release, so i would not call it recent. No funny state > inbetween, that cat is dead. As far as i can see Fedora 20+ should have > 2.0.9+, which is fine. > If you ask me, a compatibilty hack that brakes all modern systems is not > acceptable. > > I do not know how many bits and pieces could be tuned, but automake for > that one issue seems overkill. > > Henning > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Then again, CentOS 5 (and other variants of that ilk) is under official support until early 2017[1], and it uses 0.9.8[2] -- Kind Regards / med vänlig hälsning, Staffan Tjernström [1]http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-fe8a0be91ee3e7dea812e8694491e1dde5b75e6d [2]http://vault.centos.org/centos/5/os/SRPMS/numactl-0.9.8-12.el5_6.src.rpm ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ǫ���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
