On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:19:26 +0200 Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > CC kernel/irq_work.o > > In file included from ../include/asm-generic/percpu.h:6:0, > > from ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:522, > > from ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5, > > from ../arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:15, > > from ../arch/x86/include/asm/irq_work.h:4, > > from ../include/linux/irq_work.h:47, > > from ../kernel/irq_work.c:11: > > ../kernel/irq_work.c: In function ‘irq_work_queue_on’: > > ../kernel/irq_work.c:85:17: error: ‘hirq_work_list’ undeclared > > (first use in this function) > > &per_cpu(hirq_work_list, cpu)); > > Aw poo, so that's just what I _thought_ it was for. It helps optimization but does nothing for undefined symbols. That said, why don't we clean up that irq_work code and at least declare both lists, and get rid of all the #ifdefs. I wonder if gcc is smart enough to not allocate a static variable if it happens to be optimized out? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
