Re: 3.18.7-rt2: NOHZ_FULL warning at boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/06/2015 07:13 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Luis Claudio R. Goncalves | 2015-02-26 17:05:47 [-0300]:

I have been seeing the warning below at boot time on 3.18.7-rt2. Anybody
else seeing it?

This should fix it.

diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index 19c363a..0c64912 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ void __weak arch_irq_work_raise(void)
   */
  bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu)
  {
+	bool raise_irqwork;
+
  	/* All work should have been flushed before going offline */
  	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(cpu));

@@ -81,7 +83,19 @@ bool irq_work_queue_on(struct irq_work *work, int cpu)
  	if (!irq_work_claim(work))
  		return false;

-	if (llist_add(&work->llnode, &per_cpu(raised_list, cpu)))
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+	if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ)
+		raise_irqwork = llist_add(&work->llnode,
+					  &per_cpu(hirq_work_list, cpu));
+	else
+		raise_irqwork = llist_add(&work->llnode,
+					  &per_cpu(lazy_list, cpu));
+#else
+		raise_irqwork = llist_add(&work->llnode,
+					  &per_cpu(raised_list, cpu));
+#endif
+
+	if (raise_irqwork)
  		arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);

  	return true;
@@ -101,19 +115,14 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)

  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
  	if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ) {
-		if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&hirq_work_list))) {
-			if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_LAZY) {
-				if (tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
-					arch_irq_work_raise();
-			} else {
-				arch_irq_work_raise();
-			}
-		}
-	/* If the work is "lazy", handle it from next tick if any */
-	} else if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_LAZY) {
+		if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&hirq_work_list)))
+			arch_irq_work_raise();
+	} else {
+		if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list)))
+			arch_irq_work_raise();
+	}
  #else
  	if (work->flags & IRQ_WORK_LAZY) {
-#endif
  		if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list)) &&
  		    tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
  			arch_irq_work_raise();
@@ -121,6 +130,7 @@ bool irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
  		if (llist_add(&work->llnode, this_cpu_ptr(&raised_list)))
  			arch_irq_work_raise();
  	}
+#endif

  	preempt_enable();

@@ -137,7 +147,8 @@ bool irq_work_needs_cpu(void)

  	if (llist_empty(raised))
  		if (llist_empty(lazy))
-			return false;
+			if (llist_empty(this_cpu_ptr(&hirq_work_list)))
+				return false;

  	/* All work should have been flushed before going offline */
  	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()));

I can confirm that the warning is no longer issued when this patch is applied.

Thanks,
	-Carsten.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux