On 17.02.2015 19:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]:
* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]:
Ping?
On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
Ping?
No body?
bah! That mutt thing is too fast.
The raw conversation looks sane and could go upstream. This other chunk:
|+#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL) && defined(CONFIG_KVM_MPIC)
|+/* Limit the number of vcpus due to in-kernel mpic concurrency */
|+#define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 4
|+#define KVM_MAX_VCORES 4
|+#else
| #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS NR_CPUS
| #define KVM_MAX_VCORES NR_CPUS
|+#endif
should be a separate patch. Please repost including ppc ml.
Thanks! Will send a patchset separating these 2 functional changes - the
openpic raw_spinlock for upstream ppc (since it doesn't bring any
changes anyway), and the MAX_VCPUS limitation for the RT tree.
This remains of my multiple-MSI patch which someone other posted a while
ago. What happend to it?
I'm not aware of this patch, could you give more details, please?
Bogdan P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
