On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 14:05 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Mike Galbraith | 2014-11-02 08:31:47 [+0100]: > > >(sirqs suck, this makes them suck less for some boxen/loads) > > > >Subject: softirq: resurrect softirq threads > >From: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@xxxxxxx> > >Date: Mon Jan 6 08:42:11 CET 2014 > > > >Some loads cannot tolerate the jitter induced by all softirqs being processed > >at the same priority. Let the user prioritize them again. > > > >Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@xxxxxxx> > > I'm going to postpone this. While it might make sense in general I'm > going to wait for tglx, Steven and others to see if this is what we want > or if there are some plans redoing the softirq handling. You can postpone this one forever, they don't want it. I posted it for folks who may want the option. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
