Re: Doubt about v3.14-rt-rebase commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:52:21 -0200
Gustavo Bittencourt <gbitten@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is probably a silly question. I noticed that the below commits
> revert each other. Is any reason to maintain those commits in recent
> releases?

The rebase release is just that: a rebase. If a revert exists, but does
not cause any issue during the rebase, there's no reason to remove it.

I have (in fact in the last release I did) removed commits that later
get reverted. But that's because the original commit conflicts with a
new stable release, and then there's a reason to remove it.

-- Steve


> 
> commit: migrate_disable pushd down in atomic_dec_and_spin_lock
> 9056f04da7fd3bd39d5bc05cb42cf9d0f5b7b98c
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/commit/?h=v3.14-rt-rebase&id=9056f04da7fd3bd39d5bc05cb42cf9d0f5b7b98c
> 
> commit: Revert "migrate_disable pushd down in atomic_dec_and_spin_lock"
> 2137b9fff666c62077c7ae35e865eec86da0a499
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/commit/?h=v3.14-rt-rebase&id=2137b9fff666c62077c7ae35e865eec86da0a499

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux