Yes, agreed. Using the macro (), as done in the patch, is the correct way to avoid invalid pointer dereferencing. Tested with patch-3.14.25-rt22 patch on a 2 socket platform. Reviewed-by: T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@xxxxxxx> Tested-by: T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@xxxxxxx> On 12/05/2014 12:35 PM, Brad Mouring wrote: > In task_blocks_on_lock, there's a null check on pi_blocked_on > of the task_struct. This pointer can encode the fact that the > task that contains the pointer is waking (preventing requeuing) > and therefore is non-null. Use the inline function to avoid > dereferencing an invalid "pointer" > > Signed-off-by: Brad Mouring <brad.mouring@xxxxxx> > Reported-by: Ben Shelton <ben.shelton@xxxxxx> > --- > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c > index 6c40660..535321e 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c > @@ -335,7 +335,8 @@ int max_lock_depth = 1024; > > static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p) > { > - return p->pi_blocked_on ? p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL; > + return rt_mutex_real_waiter(p->pi_blocked_on) ? > + p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL; > } > > /* > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html