I recently noticed that when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is enabled we the
semantics change. From "include/linux/rwsem_rt.h":
* Note that the semantics are different from the usual
* Linux rw-sems, in PREEMPT_RT mode we do not allow
* multiple readers to hold the lock at once, we only allow
* a read-lock owner to read-lock recursively. This is
* better for latency, makes the implementation inherently
* fair and makes it simpler as well.
How is this valid? It seems to me that there are any number of code
paths that could depend on having multiple threads of execution be able
to hold the reader lock simultaneously. Something as simple as:
thread A:
take rw_semaphore X for reading
take lock Y, modify data, release lock Y
wake up thread B
wait on conditional protected by lock Y
free rw_semaphore X
thread B:
take rw_semaphore X for reading
wait on conditional protected by lock Y
send message to wake up thread A
free rw_semaphore X
In the regular kernel this would work, in the RT kernel it would deadlock.
Does the RT kernel just disallow this sort of algorithm?
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
