Re: CpuFreq Laptop Scaling broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Harry van Haaren
<harryhaaren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The functions  of interest would be, drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:
>> - static ssize_t show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> - static ssize_t store_scaling_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> const char *buf, size_t count)
>>
>> Try to add some prints there while returning errors and then try to change
>> governor from userspace and things might get somewhat better then..
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, I'll update once I have more info

Found a little time to check this: the cpufreq_get_policy() call
returns non-zero:

static ssize_t store_scaling_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                    const char *buf, size_t count)
{
    int ret;
    char    str_governor[16];
    struct cpufreq_policy new_policy;

  printk( "RT debug: store_scaling_governor() with %s\n", buf );

    ret = cpufreq_get_policy(&new_policy, policy->cpu);
    if (ret)
  {
    printk( "RT debug: ERROR: get policy() returned \n" );
        return ret;
  }


dmesg:
[   43.186804] RT debug: store_scaling_governor() with performance
[   43.186811] RT debug: ERROR: get policy() returned


This output is from a fresh boot: so it seems that the getting the
current policy after
a boot isn't functioning right here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux