On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Here's the new patch:
> >
> > Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it
> > doesn't compile. WTF?
> >
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> This is an old thread. Which kernel did you apply it to. Before I send
> any patch set out, I run a small test (heavy stress test, and also
> compile several different configs). This patch was against 3.10-rt, and
> may have already had the includes needed. I know the original patch
> compiled, but I may not have tested the second patch.
>
> Do you need this patch? Or did I miss something for 3.2-rt?
You applied it to 3.2-rt:
commit 916c8d2de3c4759f57426fa3cfee63b491e88939
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Oct 28 11:50:06 2013 +0100
swait: Add a few more users
and 3.4-rt, 3.8-rt, 3.10-rt. So far as I can see, it is broken on all
of those branches, though I only actually tried building 3.2-rt.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
