>> >> local_irq_save(); >> some_function(); >> rt_spin_lock() --> this calls __might_sleep >> local_irq_restore(); --> In this case there's a bug right? > > Yes, that's a bug. And that's why you'll see a lot of updates in the > -rt patch with things like: local_irq_save_nort(). And this is also the > cause of some of the #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL. And what makes this > change so challenging ;-) That clarifies my question. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
