24.02.2014 01:13, Thomas Gleixner пишет:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
>> 23.02.2014 23:13, Pavel Vasilyev пишет:
>>
>>> But not -rt1, -rt2, -rt3 -rt4, .... -rt99
>>
>> Or
>>
>> 3.12-rt1,
>> 3.12-rt2,
>> ...
>> 3.12-rt33,
>> ...
>> 3.12-rt111,
>> ...
>> 3.12-rt999
>> ...
>>
>> Now, to have to roll back all my changes, then work -rt patch,
>> then impose SUBLEVEL mainline diff, then last -rt patch, then my сhanges.
>
> So we need a different numbering scheme just because your workflow is
> completely backwards?
No, because in positional number systems, an increase in the senior level,
junior reset, but not stays the same. Mainline kernel and patches is senior level.
--
Pavel.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
