Question on clock drift with NO_HZ_FULL vs NO_HZ_IDLE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
After reading documentation, I follow that NO_HZ_FULL turns off the
scheduling-clock interrupt on all except the boot CPU, where as
NO_HZ_IDLE turns it off on all idle CPUs.

I understand the period scheduling-clock interrupt is required to
compensate for hardware oscillator drift. I believe that's why
NO_HZ_FULL keeps it ON on atleast one CPU. That way the drift is
compensated for.

But, with NO_HZ_IDLE, all CPUs turn off interrupt during idle. Then
how is the drift accounted for?

CC'ing Paul as well for any guidance, thanks :)

Regards,
-Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux