I was looking over the RT patch and I had a couple of questions: Is there a reason that the PREEMPT_LAZY code is not ifdef-ed out when PREEMPT_LAZY is disabled. I can't see a reason to leave it in, it's just dead code at that point. I'd be happy to do a patch to fix this. Why does preempt_disable_rt() become a barrier when PREEMPT_RT is disabled? Why isn't it just nothing? Thanks, -corey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
