Re: [PATCH] rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mike Galbraith | 2013-12-23 06:12:39 [+0100]:

>P.S.
>
>virgin -rt7 doing tbench 64 + make -j64
>
>[   97.907960] perf samples too long (3138 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
>[  103.047921] perf samples too long (5544 > 5000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 25000
>[  181.561271] perf samples too long (10318 > 10000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 13000
>[  184.243750] INFO: NMI handler (perf_event_nmi_handler) took too long to run: 1.084 msecs
>[  248.914422] perf samples too long (19719 > 19230), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 7000
>[  382.116674] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10
This is block

>[  405.201593] perf samples too long (36824 > 35714), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 4000
>[  444.704185] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>[  444.704208] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>[  444.704579] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>[  444.704678] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>[  444.705100] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>[  444.705980] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>[  444.705994] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>[  444.708315] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>[  444.710348] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08

and this is RX. Is your testcase heavy disk-io or heavy disk-io +
network?

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux