Re: [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Nicholas Mc Guire | 2013-12-02 05:41:26 [+0100]:

>>From 19ac7e10b38947dbd8d731a13243fb28490f5ab4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx>
>Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:03:52 -0500
>Subject: [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait
>
> since:
> commit c2f21ce2e31286a0a32f8da0a7856e9ca1122ef3
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Dec 2 20:02:59 2009 +0100
>
> include/linux/spinlock.h includes spin_unlock_wait() to wait for a concurrent
> holder of a lock. this patch just moves over to that API. spin_unlock_wait
> covers both raw_spinlock_t and spinlock_t so it should be safe here as well.
> the added rt-variant of read_seqbegin in include/linux/seqlock.h that is being
> modified, was introduced by patch:
>   seqlock-prevent-rt-starvation.patch
>
> patch is on top of 3.12.1-rt4
>
> behavior should be unchanged.

Applied. One note: you indented the comment by one space. It looked to
me like cited to complete commit. Please do commit-id ("one line
description) and avoid the one line space at the begin of everyline if
possible.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux