* Nicholas Mc Guire | 2013-12-02 05:41:26 [+0100]: >>From 19ac7e10b38947dbd8d731a13243fb28490f5ab4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx> >Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 23:03:52 -0500 >Subject: [PATCH] consolidate spin_lock/unlock waiting with spin_unlock_wait > > since: > commit c2f21ce2e31286a0a32f8da0a7856e9ca1122ef3 > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Dec 2 20:02:59 2009 +0100 > > include/linux/spinlock.h includes spin_unlock_wait() to wait for a concurrent > holder of a lock. this patch just moves over to that API. spin_unlock_wait > covers both raw_spinlock_t and spinlock_t so it should be safe here as well. > the added rt-variant of read_seqbegin in include/linux/seqlock.h that is being > modified, was introduced by patch: > seqlock-prevent-rt-starvation.patch > > patch is on top of 3.12.1-rt4 > > behavior should be unchanged. Applied. One note: you indented the comment by one space. It looked to me like cited to complete commit. Please do commit-id ("one line description) and avoid the one line space at the begin of everyline if possible. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html