Re: Why isn't there individual CONFIG in CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Hiraku Toyooka | 2013-10-24 21:43:14 [+0900]:

>Hello,
Hello

>CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL consists of many patches. I think it doesn't
>represent specific feature but is general term of various features.
>Why don't those features have each CONFIG_* ?

Do you have something in particular in mind?
As long as it makes sense, there are CONFIG_* introduced. If a patch
breaks locks for instance then we don't a special CONFIG item because
this what we need and we don't keep both versions around (and the non-RT
variant can work both ways).

>Best regards,

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux