Re: [rt-tests][PATCH] align thread wakeup times

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/04/2013 06:21 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> no why should you - you might want
>  
> -i 100 -d 50 -A 20
> 
> T1 0     100     200     300
> T2  20         170
> T3   40              240
> T4    60                   310
> 
> Which is quite a lot different than just stating
> 
> that i_1=100 i_2=150, etc... but initial distance "undefined" or random
> 
> so in the sense of schedulability tests these are really two seperate
> parameters and thus should be configurable independently.
> 
> That the current documentation might give the impression that they are
> in sync is a bug in the documentation not in the -d implementation.

Now, I get it. Okay, so this makes sense.

> hofrat
>  
> 

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux