On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 05:20:21 +0200 Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 15:15 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:40:28 +0200 > > Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > If maintainers are interested, I can add that and clean up hammer marks > > > so it can be applied in lieu of the existing rt wakeup patch instead of > > > being crammed in on top of it, or they can trivially do that themselves, > > > both options presuming your (implied) approval. > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > What's the final patch for this? > > Both loop removal patch or something like it (but prettier), and > Manfred's wakeup scheme to prevent the locked array lock being being > seen and reacted to by wakees, who can then contend on that lock, > defeating the whole purpose for a while. > > > Could you post another one with what you believe is the correct fix. > > As noted, I _think_ they're both needed. Can you repost as a patch series please. Thanks, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
