On 07/09/2013 12:44 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On 13-07-08 06:26 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> and so depending on LIST_BL_LOCKMASK being one. But LIST_BL_LOCKMASK is >> only one if at least on of CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK are >> defined. Without these the value returned by hlist_bl_first has the >> zeroth bit set which likely results in a crash. > > The incorrect assumption that I made was that the bit spin locks > still set/cleared the bit in the !SMP case. So if we set the bit > and the mask is zero, we get the mismatch, giving something like: > > Acked-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks everyone. > > Thanks, > Paul. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
