On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:01PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 8 July 2013 21:07, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch set hit my tree now. I wonder if it makes sense to make > > WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT depend on SMP. (Oh wait, big.LITTLE isn't > > SMP, so probably there is a better symbol to depend on?) > > Well, big LITTLE still runs an SMP kernel :) and so has this flag set. The 'S' is justified because cpu0 and cpu1 are of the same type? Are there b.L systems that have only one big and one LITTLE cpu? Do these use SMP, too? > You can make it dependent on that if required. Well, it's not required. It's just that the corresponding question in make oldconfig isn't really an enrichment for a kernel targeting an Cortex M3 :-) Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
