On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 11:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 07:03 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 10:20 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > * Steven Rostedt | 2013-05-01 20:49:39 [-0400]: > > > > > > >Is this something going into the stable tree, or does it not affect 3.0, > > > >3.2, 3.4 or 3.6? > > > > > > Mike Galbraith reported it against v3.6 so I would say that this is one > > > candidate. I just booted v3.4.41-rt55 and it runs for 20 minutes now > > > without any issues. Maybe it crashes after I sent the email but I hope > > > it does not :) > > > > Thats because the particular way to trigger the bug was to use the IP > > early demux, and it was added in 3.5 > > Is it OK to keep it? I pulled the patch into 3.2-rt and 3.4-rt. I can > remove it if you think it's not necessary and will cause a slight > performance penalty. I took it out of 3.2-rt as I needed to add a patch and rerun my tests. But I'll leave it in 3.4-rt (unless you think I shoudn't) just so I don't need to rerun the tests. I'm only posting a pre-release anyway. Thanks, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
