On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 08:43 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:32 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > On 04/25/2013 01:14 PM, Tim Sander wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I just wanted to test this release but it fails to compile with the the > > > > following error: > > > > > > > > kernel/hrtimer.c: In function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns': > > > > kernel/hrtimer.c:1045:7: error: implicit declaration of function > > > > 'hrtimer_rt_defer' > > > > kernel/hrtimer.c: At top level: > > > > kernel/hrtimer.c:1416:12: error: static declaration of 'hrtimer_rt_defer' > > > > follows non-static declaration > > > > kernel/hrtimer.c:1045:10: note: previous implicit declaration of > > > > 'hrtimer_rt_defer' was here > > > > > > > > The kernelconfig is attached. > > > > > > You do not have CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS defined. Is this on purpose? > > > > git@marge:~/linux-2.6> ls -1 arch/arm/configs|wc -l > > 122 > > git@marge:~/linux-2.6> grep -IR CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS arch/arm/configs|wc -l > > 31 > > > > Oh. Sniff, poor little things. > > > > hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug > > Perhaps the better solution is to select HIGH_RES_TIMERS when > PREEMPT_RT_FULL is selected? If they have support, most definitely. I got the impression lots of ARM boxen are impoverished.. why else would they not have it already set? -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
