Hi, what and how does the latency_hist/preemptirqsoff measure? The ftrace.txt says "preemptirqsoff" Similar to irqsoff and preemptoff, but traces and records the largest time for which irqs and/or preemption is disabled. # head -3 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/latency_hist/wakeup/CPU0 #Minimum latency: 8 microseconds #Average latency: 15 microseconds #Maximum latency: 95 microseconds # head -3 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/latency_hist/timerandwakeup/CPU0 #Minimum latency: 8 microseconds #Average latency: 15 microseconds #Maximum latency: 95 microseconds # head -3 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/latency_hist/wakeup/sharedprio/CPU0 #Minimum latency: 9 microseconds #Average latency: 42 microseconds #Maximum latency: 603 microseconds (this is OK, there are such threads) # head -3 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/latency_hist/irqsoff/CPU0 #Minimum latency: 0 microseconds #Average latency: 2 microseconds #Maximum latency: 136 microseconds # head -3 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/latency_hist/preemptoff/CPU0 #Minimum latency: 2 microseconds #Average latency: 7 microseconds #Maximum latency: 121 microseconds # head -6 /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/latency_hist/preemptirqsoff/CPU0 #Minimum latency: 0 microseconds #Average latency: 2 microseconds #Maximum latency: 29001 microseconds #Total samples: 29054669 #There are 0 samples lower than 0 microseconds. #There are 15 samples greater or equal than 10240 microseconds. The 29 ms looks bogus. There are two test-applications running and each one would cry loudly being without CPU for 10 ms or more. Or is there a possibility that the irqsoff and preemptoff alternate so that everything looks normal but there is not a single time both are possible? 3.4.25-rt37, preempt full. Thanks -- Stano -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html