Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] block: queue work on unbound wq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9 April 2013 15:28, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But how will we know if the user of wq wants to save power or not? He must
>> give some flag which is only used when power saving is enabled. We can't
>> set WQ_UNBOUND for all wqs.
>
> You have the Kconfig option + the module param for that. You don't need a flag.

I still don't agree.. Suppose there are three users A, B and C. A wants to use
WQ_UNBOUND when POWER_EFFICIENT Kconfig option and module param is
enabled. And B always want to enable WQ_UNBOUND and C doesn't want to
set WQ_UNBOUND at all..

Now, how will each of these behave differently based on module param settings.
B and C are quite clear but A needs a flag for indicating its usage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux