Re: [RT LATENCY] 249 microsecond latency caused by slub's unfreeze_partials() code.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 11:59 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> How about using spin_try_lock() in unfreeze_partials() and
> using spin_lock_contented() in get_partial_node() to reduce latency?
> IMHO, this doesn't make code more deterministic, but can maintain
> a benefit of cpu partial page with tolerable latency.

And what do you do when you fail the try lock? Try again, or just break
out?

We can run benchmarks, but I don't like playing games in -rt. It either
is deterministic, or it isn't.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux