On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2013/3/18 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> +static inline int sched_select_cpu(unsigned int sd_flags)
>> +{
>> + return raw_smp_processor_id();
>
> I feel this should be symetric with the requirement of having
> preemption disabled as in the CONFIG_NO_HZ version. This should be
> smp_processor_id().
Yes, my fault.
>> +int sched_select_cpu(unsigned int sd_flags)
>
> It would be nice to have some more precise naming. sched_select_busy_cpu() ?
You are correct that name can be improved but busy may give it a different
meaning. Maybe sched_select_non_idle_cpu()?
Thanks for your instantaneous review :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
