On 2013/2/14 1:24, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> 3.2-rt is a long term supported kernel, which lacks two RT features >> from 3.6: SLUB support and the split softirq lock implementation. >> >> SLUB has a way better performance than SLAB on RT and the split >> softirq lock implementation is necessary especially for realtime >> networking applications. >> >> The following patch series backports these features to 3.2-rt. >> >> Steven, could you please apply these patches to a separate >> 3.2-rt-features branch? > > Is it possible to separate these two features into two different patch > sets. I would like to apply the softirq changes first, and then apply > the slub changes. > > Although it looks as though the first half is softirq only 1-8, and the > second half is slub related 9-16. If that's the case, I'll just pull in > 1-8 first, play with them, and then do 9-16. > We've also ported these two features to 3.4-rt. Do you want us to post them? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
