RE: Plan to support RT on 3.8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Thomas,

I really appreciate the efforts that open-source community puts up and know this work is not for any commercial gain
I am really sorry if my query has annoyed you.


But regarding my company, I would say it is one of the best place to work at.
Here we are given freedom to interact with open-source community and I was not forced by anyone to raise this query.

And it was just a query not a demand but I am again sorry for this.


Thanks
Priyanka


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-rt-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rt-users-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Gleixner
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 4:25 AM
> To: Jain Priyanka-B32167
> Cc: Carsten Emde; Steven Rostedt; linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dev
> Manish-R65866
> Subject: Re: Plan to support RT on 3.8
> 
> Jain,
> 
> please do not take this reply as a personal affront!
> 
> This is solely about the impertinence of your employer as I have already
> ignored _three_ private mails with the same topic originated from
> Freescale management folks.
> 
> Though, I'm happy that you've been obviously forced by the same people
> which I ignored to send this mail. Otherwise I wouldn't have been able to
> give a public response.
> 
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Jain Priyanka-B32167 wrote:
> 
> > We are planning for our next BSP. For that. We would like to use Linux
> > kernel 3.8.
> >
> > It would be really helpful if you can please share the plan of RT
> > support on 3.8 kernel.
> >
> > When can the release be expected?
> 
> I think I've made it entirely clear in the past, that these stupid
> roadmap and release plan questions are annoying as hell.
> 
> 	See: http://bit.ly/XJF0em
> 
> I'm really amazed by the chuzpa of Freescale management folks to demand
> information from an Open Source project solely for the sake of Freescale
> business decisions.
> 
> I would not mind such a demand from someone who actively fosters the
> development of this project (either by providing substantial man power or
> by sustainably funding it), but it seems that none of the managers at
> Freescale noticed my recent observations about participation on
> PREEMPT_RT.
> 
> 	See: https://lwn.net/Articles/524329/
> 	and  https://lwn.net/Articles/232379/
> 
> 
> Just to make it clear:
> 
>  - Neither I nor anyone else in the PREEMPT_RT community has any
>    interest in Freescale business decisions.
> 
>  - I personally detest the abuse of Freescale engineers who are
>    involved with this project to be forced to gain information which
>    their managers could not get.
> 
>  - I call out Freescale management folks to explain why they think
>    that Open Source free-riding entitles them to demand anything from
>    the community.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users"
> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info
> at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux