Re: rt kernel, pro-audio use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/19/2012 10:30 PM, Damien Moody wrote:
Hi,

I have a couple of questions.

1. I'd like to keep informed when the rt kernel gets updated, so I can put up a new Gentoo ebuild on my site (gentoostudio.org). Is this the list for that? If not, what is?

2. I use the rt patches a la rt-sources on Gentoo. I'm a musician and audio engineer. What advantages does the rt patch set provide over other patch sets like ck-sources and pf-sources, where latency can be configured to be very low? I'd like to document this on my site.

Thanks!
Damien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
1 - yes. Have your email client filter mails with "announce" in the header, to "rt kernel updates" folder for instance. Something like that.

2 - rt-patch provides extremely low latency, if you hardware can handle it. Intel E5 is a good cpu, for extreme low latency. Ck-patches doesn`t really provide any improvement over fair-scheduler. Actually fair-scheduler performs on overall better, with lower peak latencies. Ck-patches has slightly lower average latencies. While audio-performance was similar when I tested both, visual jitter, was less with fair scheduler, and 90hz timer.

I did some tests to make linux run with the least-jitter possible. You can read the conlusions on that here: http://paradoxuncreated.com/Blog/wordpress/?p=2268

It seems RT-patch is not neccesary for very low latency audio, and a good firewire card, atleast on the old firewire-stack, hopefully the new one is as good at latency, where I ran audio at 0.33ms latency, with RT-threads.

The rt-patch using only threadmode, (not impacting performance, other than on the thread it is used) might be good for audio, since visual jitter already can be minimized on the regular kernel. if 0.33 should not work with standard and it is a software problem, or you want to try even lower. 0.2ms is very close to virtual hardware, and ofcourse is something a musician would want.

Other than that RT patch might have specific uses outside general computing and media.

Peace Be With You.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux