Re: 3.2 kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hi guys.

Hi.

> Sorry if I have asked anything wrong, but now since the kernel is now
> at 3.2.35 but then the -rt patch is still at 3.2.34, I wondered why
> the .35 patch is still not yet released.

Note: I am not an linux-rt maintainer.... but i don't think there is
some 'rule' or mandate that says the rt-devs must do point releases at
the _exact_same_time_ as the official kernels are pushed...

out of curiosity - is there some specific addition to .35 over .34
that would explain why a .35-rt release is so urgent (to you)?

> Anyway I tried applying the 3.2.34 patch onto 3.2.35 and it didn't
> give out any errors.

it looks like you have a working 3.2.35-rt kernel then ;)

cheerz

Jordan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux