On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Dear RT Folks,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
> > not announced update release to 3.6.6.
>
> Got this:
>
> ----
> net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c: In function 'nfc_llcp_register_device':
> net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c:1185:24: error: expected expression before '{' token
> net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c:1186:35: error: expected expression before '{' token
> ----
>
> when building with CONFIG_NFC / CONFIG_NFS_LLCP (builds fine when those are
> not set)
Grrr. Damned ignorants.
Does that fix it for you ?
Thanks,
tglx
------------>
Subject: nfc: Use proper lock init functions
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:03:20 +0100
Grmbl. Why insist people on using static initializers if there are
proper init functions? Just because they can?
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-stable/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-stable.orig/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
+++ linux-stable/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
@@ -1182,8 +1182,8 @@ int nfc_llcp_register_device(struct nfc_
goto err_rx_wq;
}
- local->sockets.lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(local->sockets.lock);
- local->connecting_sockets.lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(local->connecting_sockets.lock);
+ rwlock_init(&local->sockets.lock);
+ rwlock_init(&local->connecting_sockets.lock);
nfc_llcp_build_gb(local);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
