On 2012-11-12 16:49 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Hello! > > I know of people using TINY_RCU, TREE_RCU, and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, but I > have not heard of anyone using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU for whom TREE_PREEMPT_RCU > was not a viable option (in contrast, the people running Linux on > tiny-memmory systems typically use TINY_RCU). Of course, if no one > really needs it, the proper thing to do is to remove it. > > So, if you need TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, please let me know. Otherwise, I will > remove it, probably in the 3.9 timeframe. Yes, I use TINY_PREEMPT_RCU on my UP machines. It is, in fact, the only option. Cheers, -- Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
