On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned > good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14. I don't doubt there are. But we've only experienced one problem between 3.0.36-rt58 and 3.0.48-rt72. Indeed, it might be easier to evaluate the risk if all the changelogs were readily available. So far, however, we haven't discovered any other issues that give us any concerns. > Your risk assessment is definitley interesting. We have specifically tested 3.0.36-rt58 for performance in our application. Moving to 3.0.48-rt72 poses risk about whether would still be able to meet our performance requirements. And with regard to stability, the only issue we've had since our earlier moved to 3.0.36-rt58 was the netfilter problem. We initially only saw the problem on PPP related interfaces, so we reverted to 3.0.3 (non-rt) for PPP related issues. Now, if you think there are some issues that should raise eyebrows, or can point me to a list of changelogs, I'd be happy to evaluate them. Thanks, Pete -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
