On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:13:21 -0500 Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:13:35AM +0200, John Kacur wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:48:31PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > There is no dedicated realtime group in most distributions. So make the > > > > error message a bit more understandable for people not running Redhat > > > > MRG. > > > > I thought we rejected this (via irc) the first time you sent it. The idea > > of a realtime group is pretty generic, but sure, it isn't there by default > > if you don't create it. However, the worse thing about this patch is that > > your message is in no way clearer than the original. It's longer though. > > How do you feel about this wording? > > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@xxxxxx> > > diff --git a/src/lib/rt-utils.c b/src/lib/rt-utils.c > index f4da4b3..e799c15 100644 > --- a/src/lib/rt-utils.c > +++ b/src/lib/rt-utils.c > @@ -264,8 +264,11 @@ int check_privs(void) > /* try to change to SCHED_FIFO */ > param.sched_priority = 1; > if (sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m)) { > - fprintf(stderr, "Unable to change scheduling policy!\n"); > - fprintf(stderr, "either run as root or join realtime group\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "Unable to change scheduling policy.\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "This likely means you lack real-time privileges.\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "It may be necessary to run as root or create/join a 'realtime' group.\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "More details at the RTWiki:\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions\n"); > return 1; > } > I'm good with this. Clark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature