On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 22:23:08 -0700 Gregoire Gentil <gregoire@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 09/09/2012 08:52 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 15:51 -0700, Gregoire Gentil wrote: > >> In other words, is there an equivalent of > >> sched_setscheduler for thread inside the kernel? > > > > Yup, and it's even called sched_setscheduler() :) > > > > -Mike > Thanks for answering! I don't think that my question is the smartest one > ever asked on this mailing list ;-) > I've heard worse :). My only comment is that I'd think long and hard before setting my interrupt thread up at fifo:99, since that's where the migration and watchdog live and you really don't want to impact them. Are you trying to have your interrupt serviced ahead of all the other system interrupts or just trying to be up above the SCHED_OTHER threads? If the former, then you just need to be up above wherever the IRQ threads live (default is fifo:50). If the later then fifo:2 would be a safe bet. Clark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
