On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote: > spinlock_rt.h references BUG(), but it does not include bug.h, and on > some architectures (powerpc) this can cause a build failure. > > Reported-by: Iratxo Pichel Ortiz <ipichel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: leroy christophe <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > ---- > [ Thomas, can you add this patch to your queue so that I can add it to > stable. Please, let me know when you have. Thanks! ] Picked it up, thanks. Please take it right away w/o waiting for my release. Thanks, Thomas > diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock_rt.h b/include/linux/spinlock_rt.h > index 3b555b4..0618387 100644 > --- a/include/linux/spinlock_rt.h > +++ b/include/linux/spinlock_rt.h > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ > #error Do not include directly. Use spinlock.h > #endif > > +#include <linux/bug.h> > + > extern void > __rt_spin_lock_init(spinlock_t *lock, char *name, struct lock_class_key *key); > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
