Re: [PATCH 1/2] RFC cyclictest: clean up --latency ordering in getopt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "williams@xxxxxxxxxx" <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RFC cyclictest: clean up --latency ordering in getopt
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:05:01 -0700
Cc: "jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>, "dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4FA842F3.60204@am.sony.com>
References: <4FA841B4.20701@am.sony.com> <4FA842F3.60204@am.sony.com>
Reply-to: <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10

Darn it, the subject should have been:

  [PATCH 2/2] RFC cyclictest: report large measured clock latency

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] RFC cyclictest: clean up --latency ordering in getopt
  - From: Frank Rowand
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] RFC cyclictest: clean up --latency ordering in getopt
  - From: Frank Rowand

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: incorrect first latency value for --verbose option
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: incorrect first latency value for --verbose option
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RFC cyclictest: clean up --latency ordering in getopt
Next by thread: [PATCH] rt-tests / cyclictest: Make cyclictest fail if it cannot run with requested priority.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [RT Stable] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux