On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:27:19 +0200 "Wolfgang Wallner" <wolfgang-wallner@xxxxxx> wrote: > > What is the relation between these stable releases and what the OSADL > calls 'latest stable'? [1] > > Regards, Wolfgang > > > [1] > https://www.osadl.org/Latest-Stable-Realtime.latest-stable-realtime-linux.0.html > > > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:00:22 +0200, Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:59:31 -0500 > > Robert Barrows <Robert.Barrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Does the PREEMPT_RT patch have a method of determining latest stable > >> release? > >> > >> I notice that 3.0.35 goes up to rt44 was declared a stable release but > >> so was rt43 > >> Now 3.2.12 goes up to rt22, and that was updated March 23rd with > >> 3.0.35-rt44. > >> > >> Is there a reason to think that 3.0.35-rt44 is more stable than > >> 3.2.12-rt22? > >> The real question is: is there a rule of thumb on how you would choose > >> a rt patched kernel for a production machine? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -Robb Barrows > >> -- > >> > > > > The stuff that Steven releases is the stable series, while Thomas > > does the devel releases. So if you're not looking for the latest and > > greatest, I'd stick to what Steven releases. > > > > Clark I think we'll have to ask Carsten about his stable release criteria. It may be that he's being more conservative than us and staying on a 2.6 kernel. Clark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
