On 03/20/2012 04:58 PM, John Kacur wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Accept user supplied CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, overwriting the >> Makefile supplied versions. This can cause the build to >> fail if the user does not provide at least what the Makefile >> defines, but so be it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > I was just wondering what you need LDFLAGS for? Chatting with Darren > on IRC, it seems like you're using -Wl to pass options via gcc to the > linker, and we don't have loadable libs either. Maybe you could resend > the patch with just the CFLAGS change until we have a real world > reason for LDFLAGS Denys, Am I missing a reason why we need LDFLAGS? With the current Makefile. we could just add anything we want to CFLAGS in a pinch anyway... -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
