Hi, 2012/3/20 Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On 03/20/2012 12:31 PM, Remy Bohmer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2012/3/20 Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> Accept user supplied CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, overwriting the >>> Makefile supplied versions. This can cause the build to >>> fail if the user does not provide at least what the Makefile >>> defines, but so be it. >>> -CFLAGS = -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wno-nonnull -Isrc/include >>> +CFLAGS ?= -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wno-nonnull -Isrc/include >>> +LDFLAGS ?= >> >> Why not append the Makefile local flags to the user supplied flags? >> Something like: >> CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wno-nonnull -Isrc/include >> > > I considered that. Ultimately, the goal is to provide more control to > users, especially those who may be integrating the package into a larger > build system. In this case, I think control of which warnings you > display and where the includes come from should be configurable, even if > it enables them to blow their feet off. OK. Clear. Thanks. Kind regards, Remy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
