On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, John Kacur wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That's why I asked to revert the > > > > acpi-make-gbl-hardware-lock-raw.patch > > acpi-make-ec-lock-raw-as-well.patch > > > > patches, so we can get that information. > > > > It might be a non issue on 3.2 and only a 3.0 problem, but as I can't > > find anything I'm going to drop those patches from the next 3.2 > > release and wait for proper bugreports coming again :) > > > > FWIW > I believe the latter comes from here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/3/53 And how does that help? I know that the ec lock conversion was a follow up to the gbl hardware lock conversion, but I need to see the backtrace again which made us convert gbl lock. Thanks, tglx
