Re: Suggesting to include timerfd patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 22:56 -0600, Sankara Muthukrishnan wrote:
> > Steven,
> > 
> > Could you please include the patch that Thomas suggested for the
> > timerfd hangs in the email thread (link below), if Thomas is fine with
> > the patch? I did verify that that patch fixed the hangs that I saw on
> > a panda board (ARM Cortex A9 dual core).
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-users&m=132753755612168&w=2
> > 
> 
> Hi Sankara,
> 
> I follow the same stable rules that the stable mainline follows. I will
> not add any patch to the stable release that is not in either mainline,
> or in Thomas's -rt development branch. This keeps the stable tree from
> forking and getting a fix that is not upstream. A fix to stable that is
> not included upstream, may be forgotten about.
> 
> If Thomas adds it, or if this patch is in mainline (which it is
> obviously not, as it is -rt specific), then I will be happy to apply it.

It's on the way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux