On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:35 PM, William M. Quarles <walrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello linux-rt-users list, > > Fernando at CCRMA asked me to forward these bugs on to you. I hope that you can > find the information useful. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773169 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773170 Note, the above bugs were closed because they shouldn't have been reported there in the first place, so it would have been nice if you had taken the time to write two emails with the text of your problems instead of pointing us there. You are more likely to get a response that way. You also need to report the exact kernel versions. Never-the-less: I'll ignore the first bug for now, but ask you to retest when the newest v3.0.14-rt32 is available. (Assuming this is the kernel version you're working with, v3.0-rt, else let us know) As for the second "bug", with MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES, this is a known problem. If you don't care about lockdep, then you can ignore the message, it won't harm anything it's just reporting that lockdep is being disabled, but if you don't care about lockdep, you can also disable it at config time. You can also try to find this variable and up the number of trace entries that are allowed, in fact I do this quite often. However, it can be a game of whack-a-mole, because you up that value, and then reach the max of another value, and then you have to up that too. It is also possible to up everything so high that you will no-longer get good rt performance. Thanks John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html