Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:25:29AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> This smells badly like the problem we've seen on x86 before. And
> looking at the arm SMP boot code:
> 
> asmlinkage void __cpuinit secondary_start_kernel(void)
> {
> 	.....
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Give the platform a chance to do its own initialisation.
> 	 */
> 	platform_secondary_init(cpu);
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Enable local interrupts.
> 	 */
> 	notify_cpu_starting(cpu);
> 	local_irq_enable();
> 
> Here we enable interrupts, but the CPU is neither online nor active.
> 
> 	local_fiq_enable();

That's intentional.  Some of the code below needs IRQs enabled.

I think we had this reported before and I got to the bottom of it - the
platform was doing something it shouldn't.  I don't remember the details,
maybe when all the emails come through I can see the original bug report
I'll remember.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux