Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] update to cpupri algorithm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 20:41 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> > Thanks for testing! I'll redo the patches to remove the logging, and
> > send them to you again. Could you return back a 'Tested-by' tag
> > afterward.
> 
> (I did the logging removal, the posted numbers were that, but..)

Could you merge the two patches and diff them against the one I posted
privately. Just to make sure that you really tested the one I plan on
giving to Mainline.

> 
> Sure.  I've been beating on them (heftily), there are there have been no
> ill effects detected.  You can have my..
> 	Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@xxxxxxx> ||
> 	Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> (the real /me)

Heh, I'll probably take the suse.de, just because its nice to see
multiple companies on a single patch. Especially one that affects the
scheduler.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux