On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:43:43PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:37:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Dear RT Folks, > > > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt4 release. > > > > 3.0-rt5 boots single-CPU under KVM on a 32-bit laptop. Also with "-smp > > 2". It even survived a minute or so of rcutorture in both cases. ;-) > > > > Some weirdness with interactivity -- if the system is idle aside from > > rcutorture, the rcutorture.stat_interval console messages don't come > > out unless I hit "enter" on the console. But if I run "top", they do > > come out regularly. Might well be KVM's fault, except that running > > rcutorture on non-rt kernels doesn't exhibit this behavior. > > Nah, that's my lazy "avoid printing from atomic context" hack :) Well, then, that does seem to be working... ;-) Except that these printk()s are from process level -- rcu_torture_stats() in kernel/rcutorture.c. > > I guess I should try RCU_BOOST=y, then... > > Good luck :) Compiled without error and has been running rcutorture smp=2 for about 30 minutes now. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
