Re: On migrate_disable() and latencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 12:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > The scenario is on where you stack N migrate-disable tasks on a run
> > queue (necessarily of increasing priority). Doing this requires all cpus
> > in the system to be as busy, for otherwise the task would simply be
> > moved to another cpu.
> 
> This implies it requires at least nr-cpus^2 tasks to pull this off. 

OK, scrap that, 2*nr-cpus is enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux